Here's a silly little article about why people believe in the paranormal – with the term "paranormal" broadly defined to include everything from psychics to Bigfoot.
In all the "analysis," it never occurs to the writer to consider the possibility that some people believe in some paranormal phenomena because there's good evidence to support their belief. The tacit assumption is that there can't possibly be any evidence, so why look?
But then, only skeptics are cited as experts in the article, so what else could we expect?